?>
Register | Login
Currently viewing the category: "Media"

In this week’s edition of “Cynopsis: Classified Advantage” (part of a highly regarded set of newsletters from Cynopsis Media, for the TV and Media Industries) – Editor John Cox articulates the dilemma many of us face on LinkedIn:

… I received an email from someone I have never met in person, asking if I knew anyone who worked at a particular company.  I do, and I’m pretty sure he can see that I do.  He wants an introduction because he is applying for a job and would like to correspond with an insider.  In theory I have no problem in doing this.  In theory.

Many of you, particularly those who have had relatively long or successful careers, know where this is going. We’re at a stage of our careers where we have a broad network of colleagues consisting of VP-level executives, CxO’s, and other well-known founders and thought leaders. We also want to connect or otherwise help as many people as we can. It’s not just about giving back; it’s part of our modern networking culture. Bigger-picture thinking: Add value to others by passing along ideas, opportunities and connections, and it will in turn increase our value. But, here’s the dilemma:

Continue reading »

 

I finally get Klout. No, I never had much clout in any kind of situation, but I finally understand the concept of “Klout” – the social influence metric.

Klout is like a credit score for social networking influence, calculating and assigning a number that depicts a person’s relative influence (clout) in the social networking universe – Facebook, Twitter, G+, foursquare, and just about every relevant social network out there.  I remember signing up for Klout several years ago, like I do with many online services.  After an initial period of fascination, it was relegated to the back burner of my mind.

Every so often I’d get an email telling me my current Klout score.  The Klout Score is a number between 1-100 that represents your influence. The more influential you are, the higher your Klout Score.  But like getting a credit score that no one else really reads, Klout had little impact, much less meaning, in my personal or professional life.   Klout was more like a vanity metric, or an attempt at “gamification” – i.e. trying to change my behavior based on my desire to get a higher ranking on Klout.

In May, I received a gift card from Coffee Bean just because I maintained a relatively high Klout score.   I didn’t think too much of it at the time; it seemed like any one of a number of direct marketing incentives we get all the time.

Whack on the head

Then, less than 2 weeks ago, I had an “aha moment” with Klout.

Continue reading »

 

I was merely going to retweet this funny little factoid from Social Rehab – a company with apps designed to get you to reduce your online dependence – my retweet was to include an inevitable quip.  Then I realized, I had far too many clever retorts to ever fit inside a single tweet.

Before I release my incredible capacity for sarcasm on the world, I must point out that the Social Rehab factoid is misleading and inaccurate (and dated).   Apparently, I’m late to this party.   The ‘statistic’ was a meme at least as far back as 2010 when a ‘recent survey […] uncovered the disturbing statistic‘ :

Continue reading »

 

The other day I was asked to write an article for PBS’s Journalism and Innovation site (PBS – Mediashift) – on the subject of “Who is a Journalist?” spurred on by the recent and reoccurring debate on ‘what is journalism’, in the digital age:

MediaShift Idea Lab . After Crystal Cox Verdict, It’s Time to Define Who Is a Journalist | PBS

Last month, the Crystal Cox verdict re-energized a debate among journalism’s most passionate and articulate thought leaders and professionals by begging the question: Who is a journalist? Just about anyone with a laptop or cell phone can use free technology to create quality media and reach audiences larger than any newspaper or television network. Indeed, we are all publishers now. But are we all journalists now, too?

The article explored some of the issues surrounding the legal definition of “journalist”, as opposed to any more casual definitions floating around. Apparently some took issue with my assertion that there needs to me a specific definition of “journalist.” The interesting part is that the feedback came mostly from those who would describe themselves as journalists. Their contention was, citing The First Amendment’s free speech and free press protections, that anyone can be called a journalist. Apparently any definition limiting who is recognized a journalist – particularly in the eyes of the law – was an affront to The First Amendment, apple pie and the American way.

Continue reading »

 

I got an email from Foursquare a few weeks ago, that started off with:

First off, thanks for believing in our little startup as we try to build an awesome service for you. You were one of the first hundred thousand members of our community (to be exact, you’re member #39,755)! You can tell your grandkids that you were a 21st century trendsetter! They’ll look at you in amazement as they cruise by on their hoverboards.

Actually I am a little amazed that they don’t have a badge or other icon that indicates the (relatively) low member number – unless they are worried about alienating late-mainstream members.

There’s nothing like a having a low badge number in a big company

Continue reading »

 

Over the past many years I’ve developed a distaste for attending most conferences. While I love the camaraderie and exchange with colleagues and being privy to some cool and new companies – I have a deep cynicism for the conference “process”. Conferences often seem to be the purview of self-promoters (who apparently have time to speak at conferences but don’t have the time to get their product to market, and to profitability). As entrepreneur-turned-VC Mark Suster says Be Careful not to Become a Conference Ho. I couldn’t agree more.

That being said, I have pang of regret for not attending LeWeb’11 – though traveling (airports, hotels, parking etc) is something I am happy to have reduced in my life. But LeWeb seemed like one of those conferences that had the great combination of thought-leaders, new ideas/up-and-comer entrepreneurs, cutting edge products and a crowd I would have liked to have mingled.

These days I get a good deal of value from viewing live videocasts (or captured video), presentation and reading the blog commentary after-the-fact. But it’s sort of like reading the screenplay for “The Godfather” instead of watching the movie with friends. You get the core story – but not the nuances and certainly not the social experience. When someone does an impression of Don Corleone’s “I’m gonna make him an offer he can’t refuse” you’re really just an outsider if you’ve only read the screenplay.

This morning I stumbled upon an interesting new way to get a different perspective on conferences: The concept it called Live Sketching. It’s sort of a cross between those old court room sketches, twitter and those Common Craft “in plain English” videos.

Here’s the Live Sketch of the 3 day LeWeb11 conference. It really does give a different perspective and ‘texture’ to the conference, different than watching video or reading blogs.

 

The graphic below is more than a mere statistics display. Click – it is a “living” graphic of the state of the internet (and many different aspects) – constantly updated.

 

State of the Internet 2011